Turkish vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,596,046 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.825. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.434% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 434.2 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $49,173, a difference of 6.5%), median male earnings ($64,253 compared to $60,350, a difference of 6.5%), and median family income ($121,202 compared to $114,553, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $52,540, a difference of 3.3%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $65,326, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.1%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.57%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.63%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.55%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.35%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.4%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.9%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.10%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and disability (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.54%).