Turkish vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,639,273 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 16.3 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $32,345, a difference of 62.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $75,945, a difference of 55.1%), and median male earnings ($64,253 compared to $41,758, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $59,383, a difference of 14.6%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $44,003, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 81.4%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 68.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 170.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 152.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 148.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 71.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.9%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.5%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 60.6%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 58.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 43.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 128.5%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 115.9%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 99.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.070%), 9th grade (95.8% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 56.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 47.5%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 9.1%).