Burmese vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,465,408 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ute within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $83,937, a difference of 44.7%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $72,402, a difference of 42.5%), and per capita income ($52,005 compared to $36,651, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.85%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $49,997, a difference of 9.6%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $34,960, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ute communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 78.0%), receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 69.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 68.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.7%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 46.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 36.8%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 34.4%), and births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (65.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.49, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 28.3%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 68.1%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 52.8%), and bachelor's degree (46.9% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 45.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 32.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.9%).