Houma vs Ute Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
Ute
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
Ute
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ute Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,414,446 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.030% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 1,030.3 Ute.
Houma vs Ute Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Ute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 39.2%), householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $52,949, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $83,937, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $48,899, a difference of 3.4%), median earnings ($38,949 compared to $41,051, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,044 compared to $82,166, a difference of 6.7%).
Income Metric | Houma | Ute |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Tragic $36,651 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Tragic $87,596 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Tragic $72,402 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Tragic $41,051 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Tragic $48,899 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Tragic $34,960 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Tragic $49,997 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Tragic $82,166 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Tragic $83,937 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Tragic $52,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Tragic 27.8% |
Houma vs Ute Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 49.6%), single father poverty (26.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 44.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.95%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and male poverty (16.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | Ute |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 16.9% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 16.2% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 25.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 17.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 21.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 21.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Tragic 15.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Tragic 28.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Tragic 35.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Houma vs Ute Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 77.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | Ute |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 6.3% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 11.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Houma vs Ute Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | Ute |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Tragic 60.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Good 37.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Tragic 80.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Tragic 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 76.6% |
Houma vs Ute Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Ute communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 41.0%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.49, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.6% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 0.42%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | Ute |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Average 64.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Tragic 44.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Tragic 43.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Poor 33.0% |
Houma vs Ute Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 78.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 41.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.070%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | Ute |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 11.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Tragic 88.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Exceptional 56.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 22.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Houma vs Ute Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 110.3%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 81.4%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.85%), 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and 4th grade (96.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.91%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | Ute |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Average 96.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Average 95.8% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Fair 93.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Tragic 91.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 89.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 86.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Tragic 81.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Tragic 60.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Tragic 53.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 30.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 11.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Tragic 4.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Houma vs Ute Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 116.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 64.6%), and ambulatory disability (9.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 6.8%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 18.2%).
Disability Metric | Houma | Ute |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 0.86% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Tragic 27.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 52.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Average 2.5% |