Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,105,905 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 21.5 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($91,541 compared to $72,402, a difference of 26.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,109 compared to $83,937, a difference of 26.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,283 compared to $82,166, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,714 compared to $49,997, a difference of 11.4%), wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and median male earnings ($55,241 compared to $48,899, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (10.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 52.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 50.3%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 37.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.9%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.4%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.49, a difference of 3.9%), and family households (67.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 34.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.1%), bachelor's degree (36.8% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 19.2%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (90.9% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.16%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.6% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 33.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 26.6%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.6%).