Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Cambodia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Cambodia

Ute

Fair
Fair
2,971
SOCIAL INDEX
27.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
236th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ute Integration in Immigrants from Cambodia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,815,673 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.434. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to a decrease of 19.5 Ute.
Immigrants from Cambodia Integration in Ute Communities

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 19.3%), median household income ($83,304 compared to $72,402, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,537 compared to $83,937, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $49,997, a difference of 4.9%), median male earnings ($51,594 compared to $48,899, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,580 compared to $52,949, a difference of 8.7%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CambodiaUte
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,434
Tragic
$36,651
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,222
Tragic
$87,596
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,304
Tragic
$72,402
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,090
Tragic
$41,051
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,594
Tragic
$48,899
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,833
Tragic
$34,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,450
Tragic
$49,997
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,533
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,537
Tragic
$83,937
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,580
Tragic
$52,949
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.3%
Tragic
27.8%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 35.3%), single female poverty (21.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 34.2%), and male poverty (12.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 5.9%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CambodiaUte
Poverty
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.9%
Families
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
16.2%
Females
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
17.9%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
18.1%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
15.7%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
35.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
14.7%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.1%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CambodiaUte
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.6%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CambodiaUte
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
60.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.7%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.4%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.7%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
76.6%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.8%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.9% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 0.98%), currently married (44.5% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (65.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CambodiaUte
Family Households
Exceptional
65.4%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.9%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.9%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.33
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.5%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.8%
Poor
33.0%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 18.5%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.60%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 7.6%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CambodiaUte
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
89.8%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.1%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.8%), and bachelor's degree (34.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.51%), high school diploma (85.6% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and 12th grade, no diploma (88.1% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CambodiaUte
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.6%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.1%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.6%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
81.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.4%
Tragic
53.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.0%

Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 36.7%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 18.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.19%), female disability (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and disability (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Cambodia vs Ute Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CambodiaUte
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Poor
11.5%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
0.86%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Good
3.0%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.5%