Cambodian vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,462,372 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Cambodian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.405. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cambodians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.550% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cambodians corresponds to an increase of 550.1 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,731 compared to $36,651, a difference of 41.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,342 compared to $83,937, a difference of 36.2%), and median family income ($117,780 compared to $87,596, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($55,571 compared to $49,997, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,892 compared to $52,949, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 63.5%), male poverty (10.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 56.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.4%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 46.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.2%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 50.3%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 34.3%), and births to unmarried women (26.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 3.2%), family households (61.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 59.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 27.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.54%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 70.6%), bachelor's degree (47.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 52.9%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 36.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 34.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.1%).