Alaska Native vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,037,084 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.998. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.387% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 386.6 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $52,949, a difference of 14.7%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,991 compared to $83,937, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $48,899, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($43,750 compared to $41,051, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,018 compared to $82,166, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (12.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 31.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 28.2%), and poverty (13.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (15.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.7%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 115.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 56.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.2%), births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and family households with children (29.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (45.6% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 50.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 5.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 53.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.9%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 241.7%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.2%), and male disability (13.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.8% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 0.44%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.7%).