Samoan vs Ute Community Comparison
COMPARE
Samoan
Ute
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Samoans
Ute
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ute Integration in Samoan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,116,600 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.911. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.493% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 493.2 Ute.
Samoan vs Ute Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $52,949, a difference of 23.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,580 compared to $83,937, a difference of 21.0%), and median household income ($86,498 compared to $72,402, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $48,899, a difference of 5.1%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and median female earnings ($37,498 compared to $34,960, a difference of 7.3%).
Income Metric | Samoan | Ute |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,826 | Tragic $36,651 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,344 | Tragic $87,596 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,498 | Tragic $72,402 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,206 | Tragic $41,051 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,389 | Tragic $48,899 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,498 | Tragic $34,960 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,610 | Tragic $49,997 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,385 | Tragic $82,166 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,580 | Tragic $83,937 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,427 | Tragic $52,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.0% | Tragic 27.8% |
Samoan vs Ute Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (10.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 48.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 42.5%), and poverty (12.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 16.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 21.8%).
Poverty Metric | Samoan | Ute |
Poverty | Good 12.0% | Tragic 16.9% |
Families | Good 8.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Good 10.9% | Tragic 16.2% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.2% | Tragic 25.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.6% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 21.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 15.7% |
Single Females | Good 20.6% | Tragic 28.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 13.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Tragic 35.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Samoan vs Ute Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 37.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 33.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Samoan | Ute |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Tragic 11.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Samoan vs Ute Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Samoan | Ute |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.5% | Tragic 60.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.1% | Good 37.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.3% | Tragic 80.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.3% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.2% | Tragic 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Tragic 76.6% |
Samoan vs Ute Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.9%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.42 compared to 3.49, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (29.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Samoan | Ute |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.9% | Average 64.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.5% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 44.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.42 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.8% | Tragic 43.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.6% | Poor 33.0% |
Samoan vs Ute Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 51.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Samoan | Ute |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 11.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Tragic 88.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.5% | Exceptional 56.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 25.0% | Exceptional 22.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Samoan vs Ute Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 41.7%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.9%), and associate's degree (41.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.010%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
Education Level Metric | Samoan | Ute |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Average 96.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Average 95.8% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Fair 93.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.8% | Tragic 89.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Tragic 86.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Tragic 81.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.0% | Tragic 60.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 53.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.1% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Tragic 30.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 11.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 4.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Samoan vs Ute Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 40.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.30%).
Disability Metric | Samoan | Ute |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 11.6% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 0.86% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 27.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.5% | Tragic 52.6% |
Vision | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Average 2.5% |