Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Malaysia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Malaysia

Ute

Good
Fair
7,792
SOCIAL INDEX
75.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
105th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ute Integration in Immigrants from Malaysia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,677,257 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.547. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.095% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 95.5 Ute.
Immigrants from Malaysia Integration in Ute Communities

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,983 compared to $36,651, a difference of 36.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,796 compared to $83,937, a difference of 34.4%), and median household income ($96,292 compared to $72,402, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $49,997, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $52,949, a difference of 23.7%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Income
Income MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaUte
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,983
Tragic
$36,651
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,880
Tragic
$87,596
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,292
Tragic
$72,402
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,514
Tragic
$41,051
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,121
Tragic
$48,899
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,835
Tragic
$34,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,179
Tragic
$49,997
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,650
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,796
Tragic
$83,937
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,497
Tragic
$52,949
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.8%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 50.9%), male poverty (11.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 47.4%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 21.7%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaUte
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Tragic
16.9%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
16.2%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.0%
Tragic
15.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.3%
Tragic
35.7%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.7%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 38.7%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.0%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaUte
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 6.5%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaUte
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
60.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.3%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
76.6%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 44.9%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.58%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 6.2%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaUte
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.4%
Poor
33.0%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 48.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.2%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaUte
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.5%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 61.4%), bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 45.6%), and professional degree (5.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.10%), 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.45%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaUte
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Tragic
81.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.3%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.3%
Tragic
53.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.5%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.0%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 37.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 27.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.99%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.9%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Ute Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaUte
Disability
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.86%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.4%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Average
2.5%