Icelander vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,738,149 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.918. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.427% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 1,426.9 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Ute communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,987 compared to $36,651, a difference of 22.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $83,937, a difference of 21.8%), and median family income ($104,282 compared to $87,596, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $49,997, a difference of 2.5%), and median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $34,960, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (11.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 48.0%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 44.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.4%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 28.0%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.49, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 20.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 32.2%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.6%), and bachelor's degree (39.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 40.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.83%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.90%).