Yakama vs Ute Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaire
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yakama

Ute

Poor
Fair
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ute Integration in Yakama Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 7,666,979 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to a decrease of 22.6 Ute.
Yakama Integration in Ute Communities

Yakama vs Ute Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Ute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 17.0%), per capita income ($33,009 compared to $36,651, a difference of 11.0%), and median male earnings ($45,002 compared to $48,899, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($72,225 compared to $72,402, a difference of 0.25%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,992 compared to $83,937, a difference of 3.6%), and median family income ($83,932 compared to $87,596, a difference of 4.4%).
Yakama vs Ute Income
Income MetricYakamaUte
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,009
Tragic
$36,651
Median Family Income
Tragic
$83,932
Tragic
$87,596
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,225
Tragic
$72,402
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,107
Tragic
$41,051
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,002
Tragic
$48,899
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,354
Tragic
$34,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,321
Tragic
$49,997
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,226
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,992
Tragic
$83,937
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,234
Tragic
$52,949
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Tragic
27.8%

Yakama vs Ute Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Ute communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 45.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 41.6%), and married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.23%), single female poverty (28.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.74%).
Yakama vs Ute Poverty
Poverty MetricYakamaUte
Poverty
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
16.9%
Families
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
16.2%
Females
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.6%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Males
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
15.7%
Single Females
Tragic
28.3%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Tragic
35.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
14.7%

Yakama vs Ute Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 170.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 72.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.4%).
Yakama vs Ute Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYakamaUte
Unemployment
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.8%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
5.9%

Yakama vs Ute Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 0.54%).
Yakama vs Ute Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYakamaUte
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
60.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.8%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.9%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
76.6%

Yakama vs Ute Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 41.3%), births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.0% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.49, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Yakama vs Ute Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYakamaUte
Family Households
Exceptional
69.3%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.8%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.45
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.3%
Poor
33.0%

Yakama vs Ute Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 75.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 47.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 36.7%).
Yakama vs Ute Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYakamaUte
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
31.0%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
12.9%
Exceptional
8.8%

Yakama vs Ute Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.2%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.0%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Yakama vs Ute Education Level
Education Level MetricYakamaUte
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
86.9%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
85.0%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
82.5%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
74.5%
Tragic
81.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
46.2%
Tragic
53.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.0%

Yakama vs Ute Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.8%), male disability (13.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Yakama vs Ute Disability
Disability MetricYakamaUte
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.00%
Exceptional
0.86%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.6%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.3%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Average
2.5%