Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Sri Lanka

Ute

Excellent
Fair
9,026
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
34th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ute Integration in Immigrants from Sri Lanka Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,105,812 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ute within Immigrant from Sri Lanka communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sri Lanka within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sri Lanka corresponds to a decrease of 6.8 Ute.
Immigrants from Sri Lanka Integration in Ute Communities

Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,094 compared to $83,937, a difference of 41.9%), median household income ($99,943 compared to $72,402, a difference of 38.0%), and per capita income ($50,555 compared to $36,651, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,512 compared to $49,997, a difference of 9.0%), and median female earnings ($44,161 compared to $34,960, a difference of 26.3%).
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Sri LankaUte
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,555
Tragic
$36,651
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,263
Tragic
$87,596
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$99,943
Tragic
$72,402
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,268
Tragic
$41,051
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,099
Tragic
$48,899
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,161
Tragic
$34,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,512
Tragic
$49,997
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,741
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$119,094
Tragic
$83,937
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$69,426
Tragic
$52,949
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
27.8%

Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Ute communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 63.0%), male poverty (10.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 59.1%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.6%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 20.9%).
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Sri LankaUte
Poverty
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
16.9%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
16.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
17.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.3%
Tragic
35.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.7%

Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 32.2%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.0%).
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Sri LankaUte
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 6.4%).
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Sri LankaUte
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.5%
Tragic
60.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.0%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
76.6%

Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.0%), and births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (65.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.49, a difference of 8.3%).
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Sri LankaUte
Family Households
Exceptional
65.1%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.1%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.2%
Poor
33.0%

Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 42.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.25%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Sri LankaUte
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.2%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
88.9%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 69.9%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 53.4%), and bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.030%), 8th grade (95.8% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Sri LankaUte
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Average
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Good
95.8%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.2%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
81.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.5%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
65.4%
Tragic
53.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.7%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%

Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 41.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 30.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.6%).
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Ute Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Sri LankaUte
Disability
Exceptional
10.5%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
10.9%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.86%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.1%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.5%