Norwegian vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,366,293 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 8.3 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $83,937, a difference of 23.5%), per capita income ($44,480 compared to $36,651, a difference of 21.4%), and median family income ($106,144 compared to $87,596, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $49,997, a difference of 6.3%), and median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $34,960, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 75.0%), married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 73.3%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 70.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 16.4%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 21.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 60.6%), male unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 49.7%), and unemployment (4.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 30.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and currently married (50.2% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.70%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 80.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 67.7%), associate's degree (47.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 23.3%), and bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 94.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 21.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.0%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.8%).