Nonimmigrants vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,046,760 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,448 compared to $83,937, a difference of 12.5%), per capita income ($40,669 compared to $36,651, a difference of 11.0%), and median family income ($96,231 compared to $87,596, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,348 compared to $49,997, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and median female earnings ($37,024 compared to $34,960, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (12.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 33.9%), poverty (13.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 26.9%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 44.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 42.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.1%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.49, a difference of 9.5%), and births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.68%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 46.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 21.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.8%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and master's degree (13.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 86.6%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.67%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.6%).