Slavic vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,512,365 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to a decrease of 20.5 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,390 compared to $45,607, a difference of 23.6%), per capita income ($45,049 compared to $36,690, a difference of 22.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $79,956, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $50,132, a difference of 0.86%), householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $56,768, a difference of 8.7%), and median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $35,114, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.9%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 25.1%), and receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.7%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.6%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (64.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.29%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 68.7%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 55.4%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.87%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.87%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.9%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and male disability (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.2%).