Immigrants from Latin America vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,509,036 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,265 compared to $56,768, a difference of 6.6%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and median male earnings ($46,941 compared to $45,607, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($36,823 compared to $36,690, a difference of 0.36%), median family income ($86,989 compared to $87,387, a difference of 0.46%), and median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $35,114, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 32.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 32.7%), and married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.67%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 45.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 36.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 15.1%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.42 compared to 3.36, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (67.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.5%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 32.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.87%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.77%), and disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.0%).