Immigrants from Israel vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,465,633 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.517. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.082% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 82.1 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $36,690, a difference of 56.4%), median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $45,607, a difference of 50.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($117,219 compared to $79,956, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $50,132, a difference of 11.5%), householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $56,768, a difference of 23.1%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 33.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 32.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 41.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 36.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 32.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 67.3%), single mother households (5.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 43.0%), and births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.9%), currently married (48.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 63.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 63.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 7.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 42.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 170.0%), professional degree (7.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 168.4%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 120.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.51%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 53.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 35.6%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 6.9%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.7%).