Mongolian vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,112,244 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.168. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.199% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 199.2 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,173 compared to $36,690, a difference of 34.0%), median male earnings ($60,350 compared to $45,607, a difference of 32.3%), and median family income ($114,553 compared to $87,387, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $50,132, a difference of 4.8%), householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $56,768, a difference of 15.1%), and wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 24.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 24.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 43.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.20%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 46.4%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.30%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and family households (62.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 38.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 144.5%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 109.7%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 88.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.34%), 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 30.6%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.8%).