Filipino vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,778,526 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.378. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.075% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to a decrease of 75.3 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $45,607, a difference of 62.7%), per capita income ($59,066 compared to $36,690, a difference of 61.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $79,956, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $50,132, a difference of 15.2%), wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 29.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($76,686 compared to $56,768, a difference of 35.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 76.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 71.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 50.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 27.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 66.6%), single mother households (4.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 53.2%), and births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.0%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.36, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.1%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.37%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.94%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 204.4%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 158.4%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 127.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.51%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 64.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (19.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 42.1%), and vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.9%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.3%).