Uruguayan vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,525,002 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,318 compared to $36,690, a difference of 20.8%), median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $45,607, a difference of 17.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,631 compared to $79,956, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $56,768, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $50,132, a difference of 4.6%), and wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 16.8%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 40.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.5%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.5% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (45.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 38.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 58.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 56.8%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 29.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 27.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.0%).