Peruvian vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,993,077 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Peruvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Peruvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.080% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Peruvians corresponds to an increase of 80.1 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,886 compared to $79,956, a difference of 23.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,070 compared to $85,187, a difference of 23.3%), and median male earnings ($55,659 compared to $45,607, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,766 compared to $56,768, a difference of 10.6%), wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($56,052 compared to $50,132, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 25.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 24.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 38.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 29.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.2%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.090%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and average family size (3.30 compared to 3.36, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.1%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 59.1%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 54.0%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 34.2%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 29.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.1%).