Jordanian vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,011,248 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 12.8 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $85,187, a difference of 28.4%), median male earnings ($58,500 compared to $45,607, a difference of 28.3%), and median family income ($109,865 compared to $87,387, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $50,132, a difference of 3.3%), householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $56,768, a difference of 13.3%), and wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 31.6%), receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 28.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.4%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 37.1%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.21%), family households (65.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.36, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.0%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.10%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 77.6%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 62.0%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.49%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 30.4%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 6.5%).