Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,560,859 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 57.7 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $36,690, a difference of 29.2%), median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $45,607, a difference of 25.8%), and median family income ($108,830 compared to $87,387, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $50,132, a difference of 3.6%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $56,768, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.9%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 30.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.28%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.9%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.57%), currently married (46.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.36%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 93.6%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 80.1%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 69.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.63%), 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.4%).