Shoshone vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,875,677 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.895. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.190% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to an increase of 190.3 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,681 compared to $56,768, a difference of 5.8%), and median male earnings ($47,930 compared to $45,607, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($87,872 compared to $87,387, a difference of 0.55%), per capita income ($37,072 compared to $36,690, a difference of 1.0%), and median female earnings ($34,677 compared to $35,114, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (22.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 46.1%), single male poverty (16.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (20.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.33%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 81.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 57.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.6%), divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.37 compared to 3.36, a difference of 0.43%), family households (63.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and married-couple households (43.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 13.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.44%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.79%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.9%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.4%).