German Russian vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,555,113 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.094% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to a decrease of 94.4 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,673 compared to $50,132, a difference of 9.8%), per capita income ($40,266 compared to $36,690, a difference of 9.8%), and median male earnings ($49,924 compared to $45,607, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($75,856 compared to $74,205, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($55,356 compared to $56,768, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,398 compared to $85,187, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 25.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 0.98%), female poverty (14.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and single male poverty (13.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.0%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and family households (60.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.7%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (44.0% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.1%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 57.0%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 35.6%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 36.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.6%).