Immigrants vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,934,592 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to an increase of 5.4 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($54,168 compared to $45,607, a difference of 18.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,423 compared to $79,956, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,943 compared to $85,187, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $56,768, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $50,132, a difference of 6.1%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 18.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 16.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.13%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and family poverty (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 31.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.4%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (66.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.54%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 62.0%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 49.1%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (88.2% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (85.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.68%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.8%).