Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,931,407 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 8.7 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $45,607, a difference of 51.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,626 compared to $79,956, a difference of 45.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $85,187, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $50,132, a difference of 15.3%), householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $56,768, a difference of 23.5%), and wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 50.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 47.7%), and receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.6%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 40.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 52.8%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 33.3%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.77%), family households with children (30.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.36, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 27.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 132.9%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 101.6%), and master's degree (20.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 101.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.47%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.47%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 49.2%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 36.7%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.0%).