Immigrants from Western Asia vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,934,998 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Immigrant from Western Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.556. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.036% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Asia corresponds to a decrease of 35.6 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,876 compared to $36,690, a difference of 27.8%), median male earnings ($58,131 compared to $45,607, a difference of 27.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,217 compared to $85,187, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,190 compared to $50,132, a difference of 4.1%), householder income over 65 years ($62,645 compared to $56,768, a difference of 10.3%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 23.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 16.6%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.5%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 28.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.8%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (64.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 99.1%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 84.8%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 69.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 2nd grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 27.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 23.3%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.1%).