Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,845,166 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.779. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.917% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 917.0 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 56.7%), householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $50,747, a difference of 25.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $85,552, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $41,932, a difference of 0.97%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $54,538, a difference of 5.1%), and median earnings ($48,913 compared to $45,596, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 78.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 67.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.3%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 57.4%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 52.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 49.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.2%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.13%), family households (63.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 280.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 121.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 110.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 43.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 93.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 110.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 59.5%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.8%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 27.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.2%).