Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,941
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
99th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Asia Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,815,008 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.225% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 225.4 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $118,056, a difference of 20.6%), median household income ($89,496 compared to $104,796, a difference of 17.1%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $66,903, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.8%), householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $69,872, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $57,123, a difference of 10.0%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,394 | Exceptional $53,806 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,830 | Exceptional $125,150 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,496 | Exceptional $104,796 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,913 | Exceptional $56,183 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,352 | Exceptional $66,903 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,527 | Exceptional $46,502 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,914 | Exceptional $57,123 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,880 | Exceptional $118,056 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $104,992 | Exceptional $122,222 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,643 | Exceptional $69,872 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.3% | Tragic 27.1% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 17.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Good 19.8% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 26.1% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Fair 11.1% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 12.8% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Good 11.5% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Good 17.4% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Average 10.3% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.8% | Exceptional 65.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Excellent 79.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Tragic 32.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Tragic 71.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Good 84.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 84.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 21.1%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.58%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.0%), and family households (63.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Excellent 27.7% |
| Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Exceptional 48.8% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Average 3.22 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Exceptional 48.2% |
| Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Exceptional 25.0% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 37.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 4.2%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
| No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Tragic 86.5% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.6% | Tragic 53.2% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Poor 18.8% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 35.6%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.7%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.35%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and high school diploma (90.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.4% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.6% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.6% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.2% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.7% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 95.6% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 95.4% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Poor 94.6% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Fair 93.6% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Good 92.7% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Excellent 91.8% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Excellent 89.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Exceptional 87.4% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.9% | Exceptional 71.3% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.3% | Exceptional 66.6% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.5% | Exceptional 55.4% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.6% | Exceptional 48.1% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.4% | Exceptional 20.8% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 3.0% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 21.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.2%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.4%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.0% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Exceptional 46.2% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Good 3.0% | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |