Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Northern Africa
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,346
SOCIAL INDEX
70.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
121st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,329,897 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.437. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.115% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 114.5 Immigrants from Northern Africa.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $53,185, a difference of 2.5%), per capita income ($47,394 compared to $46,531, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $62,522, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 0.40%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $105,430, a difference of 0.42%), and median household income ($89,496 compared to $90,026, a difference of 0.59%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,394 | Exceptional $46,531 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,830 | Exceptional $108,161 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,496 | Exceptional $90,026 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,913 | Exceptional $49,648 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,352 | Exceptional $58,008 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,527 | Exceptional $42,084 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,914 | Exceptional $53,185 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,880 | Exceptional $99,232 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $104,992 | Exceptional $105,430 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,643 | Excellent $62,522 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.3% | Good 25.2% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.9%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.020%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.1% |
| Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Good 8.8% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Average 11.1% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Good 13.2% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Excellent 19.7% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Excellent 16.4% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Good 15.8% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Good 16.0% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Good 16.0% |
| Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Average 5.2% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Average 11.0% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Fair 12.5% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
| Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Good 11.5% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Good 17.4% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 10.2% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Poor 5.5% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.2% |
| Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Excellent 7.4% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Average 5.4% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.44%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.8% | Exceptional 66.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 80.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Poor 35.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Poor 74.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 84.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.7%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.070%), family households (63.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 63.5% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Exceptional 27.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Fair 46.0% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Average 3.22 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Good 6.2% |
| Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Fair 46.5% |
| Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.1%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Tragic 12.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Tragic 87.4% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.6% | Tragic 52.3% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Tragic 17.8% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Poor 2.2% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 97.8% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 97.7% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Poor 97.6% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Poor 97.4% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Poor 97.2% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Poor 96.9% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Fair 95.8% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Fair 95.5% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Fair 94.7% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Average 93.7% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Average 92.6% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Good 91.4% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Good 89.4% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Good 86.3% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.9% | Exceptional 67.2% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.3% | Exceptional 61.9% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.5% | Exceptional 49.7% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.6% | Exceptional 41.9% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.4% | Exceptional 17.1% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.9%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.48%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.96%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 22.4% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Exceptional 46.7% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Good 3.0% | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Average 17.3% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |