Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,653,219 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.323. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.837% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 836.5 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Asian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $112,666, a difference of 15.1%), median household income ($89,496 compared to $101,681, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $118,426, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,394 compared to $50,057, a difference of 5.6%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $44,586, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Asian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 13.3%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 13.3%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.28, a difference of 2.8%), currently married (46.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Asian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.9%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.97%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.6%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.46%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.51%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 4.1%).