Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,800,626 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.438. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.724% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 1,724.2 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $35,688, a difference of 32.8%), median family income ($108,830 compared to $85,647, a difference of 27.1%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $46,419, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $50,279, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $52,832, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 72.2%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 59.2%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 3.5%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 2.0%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 25.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 66.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 66.2%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 19.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 5.5%).