Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Germany Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,760,989 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.607. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.144% in Immigrants from Germany. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 143.6 Immigrants from Germany.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 8.7%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $39,603, a difference of 4.9%), and per capita income ($47,394 compared to $45,751, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $51,190, a difference of 1.4%), median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $56,542, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $103,282, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 10.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 8.0%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.34%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 10.5%), bachelor's degree (42.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.2%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.96%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 5.3%).