Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,213,406 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.637% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 637.0 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 13.4%), per capita income ($47,394 compared to $42,164, a difference of 12.4%), and median family income ($108,830 compared to $98,877, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $52,594, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $40,429, a difference of 2.7%), and median earnings ($48,913 compared to $46,440, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 40.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.9%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.4%), single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.62%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 27.2%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 66.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 37.2%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.0%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.9%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.73%).