Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Swiss
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Swiss

Exceptional
Good
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,517
SOCIAL INDEX
72.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
114th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Swiss Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,308,501 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.454% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 453.9 Swiss.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Swiss Communities

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 18.3%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $37,904, a difference of 9.6%), and per capita income ($47,394 compared to $44,076, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $51,493, a difference of 0.82%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $103,071, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $95,511, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweSwiss
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,394
Good
$44,076
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,830
Good
$104,396
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,496
Average
$85,681
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,913
Average
$46,315
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,352
Good
$55,731
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,527
Tragic
$37,904
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,914
Poor
$51,493
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,880
Good
$95,511
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$104,992
Good
$103,071
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,643
Good
$61,621
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Tragic
30.0%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweSwiss
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Exceptional
16.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Fair
21.4%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.1%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.95%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweSwiss
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
15.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweSwiss
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.8%
Tragic
64.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
43.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Poor
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Average
82.8%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.5%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 7.8%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.81%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweSwiss
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
49.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Exceptional
49.7%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Excellent
30.5%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.2%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 20.4%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweSwiss
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.6%
Exceptional
61.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
7.8%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.1%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 18.2%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.14%), 11th grade (93.4% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.20%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweSwiss
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.3%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Exceptional
87.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Average
65.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.5%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.6%
Fair
37.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Excellent
2.0%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.5%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.0%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swiss Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweSwiss
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Good
3.0%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%