Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,731,177 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.699. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.556% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 555.6 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $44,735, a difference of 42.3%), median family income ($108,830 compared to $78,249, a difference of 39.1%), and per capita income ($47,394 compared to $34,910, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $50,374, a difference of 3.1%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $33,291, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 109.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 74.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 25.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 36.7%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 28.0%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 0.53%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 85.7%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 60.7%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.7%).