Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Italy Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,157,607 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Italy. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 2.3 Immigrants from Italy.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $105,201, a difference of 7.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $110,434, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $54,449, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $64,065, a difference of 0.66%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $42,446, a difference of 2.2%), and per capita income ($47,394 compared to $48,654, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.25%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.8%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.14%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (63.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.99%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and college, 1 year or more (63.3% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.6%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.82%), male disability (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%).