Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Belgian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,838,629 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Belgians within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Belgians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 28.1 Belgians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 13.6%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $38,382, a difference of 8.2%), and per capita income ($47,394 compared to $43,951, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $50,113, a difference of 3.6%), median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $55,361, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $94,262, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.2%), single female poverty (20.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.48%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.47%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.1%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 20.5%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.5%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 3.1%).