Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,920,685 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.074% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 74.1 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $39,870, a difference of 18.9%), median family income ($108,830 compared to $97,288, a difference of 11.9%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $51,473, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $52,365, a difference of 0.87%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $91,624, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 41.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.1%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.7%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.52%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 79.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 48.5%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.3%).