Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Somalia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,385,164 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Somalia within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.423% in Immigrants from Somalia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 423.0 Immigrants from Somalia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $86,987, a difference of 20.7%), median household income ($89,496 compared to $74,300, a difference of 20.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $53,333, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $48,135, a difference of 7.9%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $37,914, a difference of 9.5%), and median earnings ($48,913 compared to $43,100, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 43.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 43.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 7.9%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.4%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 20.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 69.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (46.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 20.5%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.19%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 20.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 61.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Somalia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 23.0%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.9%).