Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yugoslavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Yugoslavians

Exceptional
Good
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,775
SOCIAL INDEX
65.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
143rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yugoslavian Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,223,542 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.169% in Yugoslavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 168.8 Yugoslavians.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Yugoslavian Communities

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $42,792, a difference of 10.7%), householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $58,243, a difference of 9.3%), and median household income ($89,496 compared to $82,186, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $51,028, a difference of 1.7%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $53,967, a difference of 6.3%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweYugoslavian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,394
Fair
$42,792
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,830
Fair
$100,119
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,496
Poor
$82,186
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,913
Fair
$45,846
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,352
Fair
$53,967
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,527
Tragic
$38,573
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,914
Tragic
$51,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,880
Poor
$91,368
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$104,992
Fair
$97,558
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,643
Tragic
$58,243
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Tragic
26.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 8.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.17%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.88%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweYugoslavian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Good
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Average
17.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Good
15.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Good
16.2%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.1%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.30%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.55%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweYugoslavian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweYugoslavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.8%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.7%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.16%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and family households (63.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.60%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweYugoslavian
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Good
30.8%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.99%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweYugoslavian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Exceptional
91.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.6%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Average
6.3%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 28.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweYugoslavian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.3%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Excellent
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.5%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.6%
Fair
37.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
1.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.1%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 12.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.82%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Yugoslavian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweYugoslavian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.2%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Good
3.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Fair
2.5%