Immigrants from Lithuania vs British West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,807,550 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of British West Indians within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.457% in British West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 457.2 British West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 58.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,336 compared to $85,571, a difference of 33.6%), and median family income ($118,053 compared to $88,987, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $51,844, a difference of 6.1%), median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $40,299, a difference of 7.5%), and median earnings ($52,769 compared to $44,552, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 93.5%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 71.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.9% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 65.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.1%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 41.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 41.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 27.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 59.7%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 37.0%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.32, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 202.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 63.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 28.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 57.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 61.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 61.4%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.6%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.99%, a difference of 28.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.0%), male disability (10.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 8.5%).