Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Navajo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Lithuania

Navajo

Exceptional
Poor
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Navajo Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,183,923 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.883% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 883.2 Navajo.
Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Navajo Communities

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $29,031, a difference of 76.9%), median family income ($118,053 compared to $70,989, a difference of 66.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,336 compared to $69,759, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 27.9%), householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $42,380, a difference of 29.8%), and median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $33,046, a difference of 31.1%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaNavajo
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,361
Tragic
$29,031
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$118,053
Tragic
$70,989
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,836
Tragic
$59,159
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,769
Tragic
$36,999
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,346
Tragic
$42,098
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,317
Tragic
$33,046
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,028
Tragic
$42,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,149
Tragic
$66,529
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$114,336
Tragic
$69,759
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,087
Tragic
$47,722
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Exceptional
22.4%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 174.4%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 160.5%), and male poverty (9.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 137.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (25.2% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 59.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 74.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 76.4%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaNavajo
Poverty
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
23.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
18.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
22.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
23.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.4%
Tragic
30.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
23.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
31.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
30.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
30.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Tragic
30.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
25.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Tragic
31.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
29.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.2%
Tragic
40.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
17.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
19.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
21.1%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 111.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 103.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 97.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 32.5%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaNavajo
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.4%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
9.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
29.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
13.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
8.2%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 15.6%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaNavajo
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
56.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
69.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Tragic
32.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 85.6%), single father households (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 69.1%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 68.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.56%), family households (63.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.3%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaNavajo
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
66.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.6%
Tragic
40.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.65
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
39.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 20.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.60%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaNavajo
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Exceptional
90.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Average
55.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
22.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
8.2%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 96.1%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 94.0%), and bachelor's degree (44.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 88.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaNavajo
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Fair
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
92.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Tragic
90.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.1%
Tragic
87.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
85.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
81.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Tragic
56.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
50.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.4%
Tragic
32.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.6%
Tragic
23.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
9.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 63.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 62.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 61.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.6%), and female disability (11.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 26.2%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Navajo Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaNavajo
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
14.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
33.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.9%
Tragic
58.3%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
4.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%