Immigrants from Lithuania vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,627,415 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 49.5 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $44,440, a difference of 15.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,149 compared to $94,622, a difference of 14.3%), and median household income ($96,836 compared to $85,101, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $61,735, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $50,554, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 24.9%), single female poverty (17.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.7%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.77%), married-couple households (48.6% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and family households (63.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 45.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.4%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 21.9%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.1% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.090%), high school diploma (91.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and 11th grade (94.1% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.6%).