Immigrants from Lithuania vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,639,923 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.657. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.457% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to a decrease of 457.1 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,149 compared to $84,235, a difference of 28.4%), per capita income ($51,361 compared to $40,152, a difference of 27.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,336 compared to $90,691, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $38,391, a difference of 12.8%), householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $48,691, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $56,615, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (12.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 54.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 53.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.6%), single male poverty (11.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.6%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 32.1%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.9%), family households (63.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 24.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.2%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 36.0%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 31.9%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 7.4%).