Immigrants from Lithuania vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,724,932 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.442. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.712% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to a decrease of 712.1 Nonimmigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $40,669, a difference of 26.3%), median family income ($118,053 compared to $96,231, a difference of 22.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,149 compared to $88,301, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $49,348, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $57,426, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 40.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 40.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.7%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 28.1%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.0%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 43.0%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 38.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 36.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 31.9%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 7.1%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.5%).