Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Lithuania

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Exceptional
Fair
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,514,708 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 40.4 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,361 compared to $39,827, a difference of 29.0%), median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $50,298, a difference of 25.9%), and wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $48,749, a difference of 12.9%), median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $38,028, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $57,114, a difference of 15.7%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,361
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$118,053
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,836
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,769
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,346
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,317
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,028
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,149
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$114,336
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,087
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Exceptional
22.8%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (12.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 49.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 49.6%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 13.1%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.4%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.2%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.9%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.52%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
82.0%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.2%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.5%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.6%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Poor
32.9%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.7%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.65%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
6.2%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 86.1%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 41.2%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.1%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.4%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.6%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
1.7%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 28.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.41%), male disability (10.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 6.7%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.5%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.9%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Average
2.5%