Immigrants from Lithuania vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,750,042 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.292% in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 291.8 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $65,329, a difference of 18.7%), per capita income ($51,361 compared to $45,195, a difference of 13.6%), and median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $39,159, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $64,108, a difference of 3.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,336 compared to $110,201, a difference of 3.7%), and median household income ($96,836 compared to $91,991, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 30.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 27.0%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.78%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 26.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 26.3%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.8%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 50.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 40.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 45.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.7%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.6%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.0%).